Mike Pereira: Time to create an unneccesary headline and go against everything I have ever said when working in the NFL so Fox can pimp me some more. What channel is the NFL Network on Time Warner Cable? Secret Base and Split Zone Duo's Steven Godfrey (@38Godfrey) joined us to talk about the upcoming college football season, which means we . You guys amaze me with your stupid rule book bs. If we would have gotten the call the way it should have been, the Patriots would have never drove down and tied the game up, thus no overtime drive, and again no field-goal. The call against the Raiders was not the tuck rule. I dont give a damn if you, the rule book, Mike Pereira, Roger Godell, The Fonz, the Waterboy, Radio, or every cafeteria lady in America says that it was an incomplete pass.the replay clearly shows it was a fumble! The Patsies got lucky, because otherwise, the game would have ended right there. In 2008, Brady suffered two torn ligaments during the Patriots season-opening game with the Kansas City Chiefs. The call was overturned upon review and ruled an incomplete pass, with the tuck rule cited. 1 draft pick, Mike Pereira: Time to change the tuck rule, Report: Derek Carr wants $35 million per year, The Raiders are the betting favorites to land Aaron Rodgers, Mike McCarthy: Kellen Moore wants to light the scoreboard up, I want to run the damn ball, ESPN reiterates report that Lamar Jackson wants a fully-guaranteed deal, Arrest warrant issued for Jalen Carter for reckless driving, racing, Aaron Rodgers says hell make a decision soon enough, Competition Committee begins to explore the quarterback push play, Players say Chiefs discourage them from reporting injuries, have NFLs worst training staff, Report: Jalen Carter was present at teammates fatal crash, misled police about it. However, in the fourth quarter, Brady led the Patriots on a 10-play, 67-yard drive, completing nine consecutive passes for 61 yards and finishing it with a 6-yard touchdown run with 7:57 left that made the score 1310. I've brought it up before and gotten downvoted. Accusing of spying on . Where is the arm at that point? Drew Bledsoe was done with the Patriots as soon as Brady, the far younger and cheaper option, led the team to the playoffs. What time do NFL fantasy waivers go through? Bradys was a fumble. "When [an offensive] player is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional forward movement of his arm starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body. This is referred to as the tuck rule because the ball leaving the quarterback's hands is considered a forward pass even if the quarterback intends not to pass the ball, but instead continues the forward motion to tuck the ball back into his body. Tucker makes the case that there is a war against Christians happening in America on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight:' TUCKER CARLSON: You always imagine in your mind's eye that it's evil men who destroy . In the overtime, Vinatieri kicked a 23-yard field goal to win the game for the Patriots. Charles Woodson on the blitz knocked the ball from the QB's hand and the Raiders retrieved it, with the on-field decision a fumble and therefore a win for Oakland. It was a pump fake that he brought back to his body. But they didnt win. Jan 11, 2011 12:09 PM Either the QB throws it or they secure itdropping the ball is a fumble. But on replay, Carey said it was an incomplete pass because of the tuck rule. It's been nearly two decades since he walked out of a snow-covered Foxboro Stadium on the wrong end of a 16-13 overtime loss to the Patriots in the infamous "tuck rule" game during the 2001 . Two games later, the Patriots won Super Bowl XXXVI. IF that scumbag didnt have money on the game and the raiders win then the Raiders go on to win the superbowl for the next 3 maybe 4 years It prohibits runners and defenders from lowering their heads and striking a forcible blow with. whats a td what isnt (calvin johnson, arian foster and someone else) While the Patriots were slightly out of field-goal range, Brady dropped back to pass, with no open receivers. Impossible. I know this play has caused Raider fans and many other fans significant consternation over the years. Had the play been ruled a fumble, the Patriots would have lost . The most unnatural rule in football. it looked like he was patting the ball to throw a pass not tucking it anyway. As a Patriots fan, I also support a rule change. Because the play was initially ruled a fumble, instant-replay rules required the referee to see "incontrovertible visual evidence" on the replay that Brady had not "tucked the ball into his body and then {lost} possession" of it before reversing the original call on the field. Instead of 4th and long with a little more than a minute remaining, it became first and goal. The game, played under a heavy snowfall, was the last at Foxboro Stadium. Gruden was dismissive of Davis' views on the matter, and the subsequent breakdown in relations between owner and coach led to Gruden being traded to Tampa Bay and becoming their head coach in 2002. The newest 30 for 30 will, however, be streaming on ESPN+, which is available for $6.99/month,. Is it any coincidence that that rule never came up until the last couple of years? https://t.co/0qXIiq5Ux9, Brady said, "The Tuck Rule game against the Raiders," then looked around as if to make sure no one was listening, adding, "might have been a fumble. Now focus on getting rid of your insane owner. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/14/AR2005101401828_2.html. But its not as if St. Louis would have replaced New England as the NFLs most successful organization. I would support a rule change, although it took me a long time to get to this point, Pereira said. The Patriots won the toss and took the ball to start overtime. That is not a tucking motion That is already tucked. The Tom Brady rule states that a defender on the ground who has not been pushed into the quarterback cannot lunge at a quarterback's knee or lower legs. Dont blame the refs for your teams lack of sack. Doesnt that now become a fumble because the passer held onto the ball past the predetermined point of a throwing motion? It's time to get rid of it. If it is taken out, you have to decide when the forward arm motion stops being a pass and starts to become fumble territory. raidernationabby the rule is correct. Does the Patriots dynasty if you can call it that happen? Allen stated that he heard the Patriots' play call. worst call in history of sports. February 1, 2022 8:06 am PT. Brady, who recently announced his retirement, is now a seven-time Super Bowl champion who . at On January 19, 2002, NFL history was changed forever. I love how people act like the Pats won against the Raiders only because of the tuck rule. No more "was his arm going forward?" Tuck Rule AKA F@cked Rule because someone always gets F@cked as a result of this rule!! In the waning minutes of the second quarter, Patriots defensive end Anthony Pleasant apparently forced Jets quarterback Vinny Testaverde to fumble the ball, with Patriots defensive end Richard Seymour making a recovery. Incomplete pass? To make the right call. You had your chance the next season, and the Bucs beat you by 50 touchdowns Is Tom Brady the same great quarterback without that first Super Bowl win? . [7] The owners abolished the rule with a 291 vote at the 2013 annual meeting in Phoenix on March 20, 2013. Tuck rule or not the raiders got robbed. elyasm, the arm doesnt even have to be moving forward at the time the ball is knocked out to make it an incomplete pass. 1:13 pm ET. Do me a favorgoogle it and watch the replay. Now days it would be a hands to the face (hitting the quarterback in the head) penalty (15 yds) which is a little better than the incompletion I think. Now if you could just pick up a first down on 3rd and 1, the Pats never get it back in the first place. It was 10 years ago. I am sure the rest of the world is a better place after seeing your post above. Patriots kicker Adam Vinatieri later tied the game with a 45-yard field goal; in overtime, the Patriots defeated the Raiders on another field goal. WE WILL WIN! After Brady dove to the 5 and centered the ball, Vinatieri kicked a 23-yard field goal, giving the Patriots a 1613 victory and advancing them to the AFC Championship Game. And Ive reached a point where I dont have hate for the Raiders anymore. 4 Reply Jamie_Naughright A ten year mental lapse thanks Mike! Blame the ones that make the rules- Perreira does a great job explaining the stupid a$$ sh!t. Patriots should have had 1st and 10 with an extra 15 yards. According to the rule, he insists the call was made correctly and reiterated those feelings. The Raiderswent 10-6 and would have had to go on the road to Pittsburgh against the No. (This was also the game in which Patriots quarterback Drew Bledsoe was injured by a hit from Mo Lewis, giving backup Tom Brady a chance to play.) In Week 17 an incredible three games featured an example of these . Gruden made a reference to the Tuck Rule game in his introductory press conference upon his return to the Raiders, turning to former Raiders cornerback Charles Woodson and saying "Brady fumbled that ball". The Oakland Raiders were playing the New England Patriots, whose quarterback was Tom Brady. The NHL's version of the "tuck rule" hasn't drawn the most positive response from fans and certain players since it became something officials would finally crack down on this season.. Teams that were the victims of blown calls in big games? If the ball lands to the side of, or behind the QB, its a fumble / backwards pass. has raised the minimum level of assets under management for new clients to $50 million. harrisonhits2 says: Jan 11, 2011 12:11 PM. By. @tooz56 Whatever patriot fans. So in your opinion that 2nd down and 10 really sealed the game for the Pats even though it didnt create a score, and the Pats still trailed at that point in the game. (#94 -> #33, for example). I am so sick of hearing about the tuck rule. In March 2013, the NFL committee proposed to league owners that they vote to eliminate the tuck rule. Not only was it a season-changing event for a Raiders team that had the potential to go down as Super Bowl champions, but it . . Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. Except for two things. Geeze the moron Raider fans really come out over the tuck rule. So the rule was fine for 10 years but now you see the wrong it it???? However, you should always double-check the ingredients on the package to see if the product contains eggs. Register now! The ruling made the game exceptionally hard to referee, as well as giving a big advantage to the quarterback. Well guess what, the raiders won the game when Woodson forced the fumble and Beikert fell on it. if 50 guys at the bar think it's a fumble, then it's a fumble. "[1] Pereira said the rule came up in games about 12 to 15 times per season and explained that despite its unpopularity, the competition committee had been unable to come up with a better rule. So get over it, Charles Woodson. Pereira said Carey properly applied the rule as its written, just as Pereira has always said referee Walt Coleman properly applied the rule when he overturned what appeared to be a Tom Brady fumble in a playoff game against the Raiders nine years ago. terumiarai says: The rule makes sense the way it is, changing it would just create ambiguity. Two class of HatersOne class that likes challenging Raider fans and pointing out the many trials and tribulations of their team and complete morons. The Patriots were the #2 seed in the AFC playoffs, having posted an 115 winloss record in the regular season. No . Jan 11, 2011 3:17 PM Is hard reset only way to salvage Jets QB dilemma? The arm is moving forward in both cases. The Rams probably win another title, adding to the legacy of the Greatest Show on Turf. This is consistent with most NFL rules as the league tries to make as many rules applications as possible a simple black-white decision (think helmet-to-helmet contact). If the Raiders were that great how come they couldnt stop the Pats on one of the following plays ? They had already lost in the playoffs and Mike Pereira and his crew of crooked and biased referees can go straight to hell for their ignorance! First of all, I agree, its time for the ruled to be changed! The Raiders at one point paralyzed a Patriot player. Later in the quarter, Patriots receiver Troy Brown returned Shane Lechler's 37-yard punt 27 yards to the Patriots 46-yard line. That was the last great Rams team, not matter how their season ended. "[11], The Raiders complained extensively that the call was wrong, and that it was made against them because the league had a vendetta against the team, an attitude Oakland quarterback Rich Gannon said was "totally nonsense. IMO -if the QB is so pressured by the defense that the ball comes loose,if forward motion doesnt carry the ball past the line of scrimmage (or to the feet of an eligible receiver in the backfield) then it should be a fumble. Any idea which it actually was? Raiders defensive backCharles Woodson tackled Brady, causing the ball to land on the field and allowing Oakland linebacker Greg Biekert to recover the football. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like "I volunteer!" I gasp. Replays showed there was no illegal contact. "Katniss, the girl who was on fire.", When I was younger, I scared my mother to death, the things I would blurt out about District 12, about the people who rule our country, Panem, from the far . Stay classyAwesome post (especially like you putting god in your postMind you it was a little g since you are probably a church going man). The tuck rule was abolished on March 20, 2013, by a 291 vote of current teams. They are the ones who make up these rules and train the refs in interpreting them. The tuck rule had been on the books for years, . By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Then drop it. It's a ridiculous idea. It may have taken him a little longer to earn that genius label without that brilliant Super Bowl game plan he devised for the Rams on his resume. It's been 10 years since the infamous tuck rule game, and the rule itself reared its ugly . Then, after a 33-yard punt by Walter gave the Raiders a first down on their own 49, a 22-yard reception by receiver Jerry Rice set up Janikowski's second field goal, from 45 yards, giving the Raiders a 133 lead with two minutes left in the third quarter. Speaking of which, when does it stop becoming forward motion of a pass, and start being a fumble? Oh, how things might have changed if the play was ruled a fumble and not an incomplete pass on Jan. 19, 2002. Incomplete pass? Yes, keep the rule until each team has experienced it at least once. Pereira sucks everytime he says how a challenge will go the ref comes out and does something completely different I dont care for that guy, WELL SAID theandy59 Im age 52 and watched that game myself Then the refs had the gall to add two unsportsman penalties, putting the ball on the five yard line, when in fact the game should have been over. It was enforced to the letter of the law in 2001. It was incorrectly applied in the Raiders/Pats game. After instant replay, referee Walt Coleman reversed this call, declared the play an incomplete forward pass, and gave possession back to New England. 2 The 'tuck rule' became famous after a New England vs Oakland showdown in 2002 Credit: AFP This rule caused much controversy and was eventually abolished in 2013. The Tuck Rule Victoria Saeli Sports 4.9 29 Ratings; A weekly football podcast hosted by Victoria (@dirtbagqueer) and Katie (@KatesOfHeaven). I love how people act like the Pats won against the Raiders only because of the tuck rule. ", The Raiders responded to the video on Twitter, saying, "Knew it.". Since then, the match has been known as the 'Tuck Rule Game'. QBs dont deserve a free pass. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. https://ftw.usatoday.com/2017/01/nfl-tuck-rule-game-new-england-patriots-oakland-raiders-what-if, that brilliant Super Bowl game plan he devised for the Rams, his game plan for Super Bowl XXV against the Bills is actually in the Pro Football Hall of Fame, 2023 NFL Combine Winners Day 2: It's (another) bumper crop of cornerback talent, LaDainian Tomlinson's nephew going through drills at the combine is sure to make you feel old, 17 NFL greats who were terrible at the scouting combine, Where to watch the NFL Combine, live stream, TV channel, Defensive Backs, The Bears have a smart reason for playing darts and mini golf in their NFL combine interviews, A Seinfeld clip was brilliantly used to analyze John Lynch's body language for Trey Lance talk, The Red Sox found a loophole in the MLB shift ban and it stinks for Joey Gallo, The Warriors left Russell Westbrook ridiculously wide open and it worked to perfection, Survivor 44: Meet the castaways who will compete for $1 million in Fiji, Watch: Man tries feeding bison near Yellowstone; it doesnt go well, 2023 NFL Combine Winners Day 1: Blazing-fast DTs give the Bears plenty to consider, Ranking all 32 NFL teams' helmet logos, from worst to best, How bald eagles really sound (it's not like in the movies), Your California Privacy Rights/Privacy Policy. For a decade as the NFLs head of officiating, Mike Pereira was the man who had to come forward publicly and defend the infamous tuck rule and the referees who applied it under controversial circumstances. As it happens, his last game involved the Patriots. In the closing moments of the fourth quarter and with the Pats trailing by three, Brady received the snap and stepped back into the pocket to pass. (Of course raiders sold the most merchandise back then and where a very popular team ..the league was not about to put NE in the superbowl they would have lost $$$ at the time). By taking the hit, the Patsies also got to see what the Raiders were doing defensively. Thank you. hahaha Ben????? . I would bet my house that the scumbag instructed goose to break gannons arm. So if they rule its not a fumble then it should be ruled intentional grounding, with loss of that down, and ball placed at the spot of where the ball hits the ground. To say that the Raiders simply were beaten by the Patriots is one of the stupidest things I have ever read. Tom Brady should have to throw left handed if he hasnt thrown an INT in three games. So what would have changed? Get 1 free month of Audible by clicking the link belowhttp://www.audibletrial.com/JKSCheck out the JKS website https://www.jacksonkruegersports.com/Follow me. There will be more than one character in some, Eggs are not commonly found in tortillas. "[1] The NFL's Competition Committee re-examined the rule after the season but did not change the rule. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble.[7]. Dont fix what aint broke. Brown fumbled the ball at the end of the return, but Pats linebacker Larry Izzo recovered it with 2:06 left on the clock. There was less than 2 min left in the game when that fumble happened Unlikely the Pats wouldve gotten the ball back. Remember how you sucked in the Tampa Bay superbowl? I was young and didn't watch football at the time. Its just like that asinine interpretation about end-zone catches requiring a Football Move after the catch to be ruled a completion. One fumble would not have stopped him from working hard on his game and developing as he did. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble.[1]. Both teams struggled in the heavy snowstorm during the first half, combining for the same number of punts as first downs (11) and converting only one of 13 third downs. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. And even Marshall Faulk started to decline after that 2001 season. Once he saw a replay, Coleman quickly reversed his previous ruling, telling ESPN it was an "easy" call. Oakland kneels on the ball and kills the clock. I will never understand why the media will not set this straight. Dont let revisionist history fool you: This wasnt some great Oakland team that was destined to win it all. The Tuck Rulewas a controversial call that will be discussed for a very long time, but its impact on the league, outside of that 2001 season, is entirely overblown. New England went on to win Super Bowl XXXVI, beginning a run of championships with Brady and head coach Bill Belichick, appearing in nine Super Bowls and winning six.[4][5]. Yes maybe it was the correct rule or whatever, I'm not arguing that. It was 20 years ago today, when the Patriots played the Raiders, in a snow bowl matchup often referred to as as 'The Tuck Rule Game." The resulting win, leading to an incredible run of postseason victories and Super Bowls for former Patriots quarterback Tom Brady and the Patriots. Not much would have changed for Belichicks legacy, either. The 106 Oakland Raiders were the #3 seed and had beaten the Jets in an AFC wild card game, 3824. I dont question whether the rule was correctly applied. thats why we have instant replay now. With 1:12 left in the first quarter, a 15-yard fair-catch interference penalty against Patriots defensive back Je'Rod Cherry at the end of Ken Walter's 39-yard punt gave Oakland a first down at midfield, where they drove to a 70 lead on Gannon's 13-yard touchdown pass to James Jett. Its called a clue. After the Patriots maintained possession, Brady completed a 13-yard pass to David Patten to the Raiders' 29. Were talking, of course, about the infamous Tuck Rule game, in which the New England Patriots, thanks to a late Tom Brady fumble being overturned because of an obscure rule, beat the Oakland Raiders to advance to the 2002 AFC Championship Game. According Paragraph 3036 of Marine Corps Order P1020.34G, which governs uniform regulations, wearing an olive-drab undershirt while in cammies is optional, though in the case of parades . NFL Coach's Challenge At any time before the two-minute warning of each half or overtime period, the head coach of either team can signal a challenge by throwing a red flag onto the field. Brady played in the 2000 Thanksgiving game @ Detroit, so this wasn't his first game. [8] The only team to vote against the elimination of the tuck rule was the Pittsburgh Steelers, while the New England Patriots and Washington Redskins abstained from the vote. Great teams overcome adversity. Other football associations rule it an incomplete pass or a fumble. He then rushed to his sideline and told his team what he had heard. No shiz-nit sherlock!! he is no longer in the act of throwing. A few plays later, Raiders defensive back Johnnie Harris intercepted a pass from Brady on the Patriots 41-yard line, but New England's defense managed to force a punt, which would be the final result of every following drive from either team until the end of the half. Oh no, wait, Steelers fans would lose out then. section: | slug: tom-brady-admits-controversial-tuck-rule-game-play-might-have-been-a-fumble-and-not-an-incomplete-pass | sport: football | route: article_single.us | [9], Raiders vs. Patriots ("Tuck Rule Game") (2001), Last edited on 27 December 2022, at 03:51, AFC divisional playoff game on January 19, 2002, "New York Jets at New England Patriots September 23rd, 2001", "Crookdnose's Favorite Football Memory: The Snow Bowl", "Bell: NFL Can Finally Tuck Away Horrible Rule", "2016 Official Playing Rules of the National Football League", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tuck_rule_(American_football)&oldid=1129789094, This page was last edited on 27 December 2022, at 03:51. Raiders were the best team in the NFL from 2000-2003 WOULD OF BEEN LONGER PERHAPS IF IT WASNT FOR THAt SCUMBAG! And it's most famous use came in the 2001 AFC Divisional showdown between the Raiders and the Patriots. Defies every logic. Also the fact that Pereria had to struggle with defending it FOR THE LAST TEN YEARS after the fact before finally COMING CLEAN only goes to prove the point that the Tuck Rule is a BAD rule (sorry Harrisonhits2 your logic above is as bad as usually). I think everybody probably sees that and says it's a bad rule. All Rights Reserved. An existing rule was strengthened as a result of this. The Tuck rule should have never came into play. Mike Pereira will never admit fault with regards to the rules or officials in public. It makes no sense to allow a QB to act like he is going to throw the ball, not let it go, then try to pull it back & then drop it in a tucking motion but then get to keep it. I question the existence of the Tuck Rule. An intentional forward movement of an offensive players arm is considered the start of a forward pass, according to a former NFL rule that was implemented in 1999.